Who cares? Now that C-boy has been airlifted out, there is nobody left to root for or against. Game over.
I may return to recapping on the next series if it warrants. I long for a return to Survivor where the contestants have some clue about either strategy or survival. This group of airhead goofballs are really not worth wasting time on.
Enjoy.
Advertisements
Dear Sir!
Here You have short info about our party the only CNFHR’s in the World.
Yours
Dr. Adolf Nowak
NSPAP
> > This and next year possible is, a short, 10 unit serie of model “2013” to built.
> > (End eventually 2014 on new IE.4 class magnet engines with 30% less electrical power intake, also some 160-170% overall efficiency).
> > Here are technical specs.
> > S= Siemens, H stays for Helmke engine producer.
> > Engine power
> > [kW ] …. …. … . … …. … . …. ….11.00…. …. … ….15.00… … . …. …18.50
> > Heat production
> > [kWh ] …. … … . …. …. … …. …16.00 … . … … . .22.00 …. … … . .. 28.00
> > Electrical power : [kWh ]
> > S/H. …. …. … …. …. …. … ….14.40/14 .00 … . .19.50/19.00 ……24.50/24.00
> > Heated room: [m 2 ] (by 30/75 kWh norm)
> > … …. … …. …. …. … …. …. ….1.300/500 … . … 1.800/700 … …. 2.300/900
> > Total mass
> > [kG ] …. …. … …. …. … . … …. ..115 … . …. … …. …132 … … . … . … 150
> > Process efficiency (%)
> > S/H … . … . …. … …. …. …. …110/114 … . …. ….112 /115 … … . …114 /117
> > Mechanical efficiency (%)
> > S/H … . … . …. …. … …. …. …194 /194 … … . … 195 /195 … . … …201 /201
> > (electrical into mechanical power output which is 75% of nominal engine power)
> > f.e. 11 kW engine real crankshaft mechanical power (load) is 8.25 kW only for longevity of engine.
> > Siemens IE.2 engines are today 16x leiser over previous EFF2 (IE.1) class engines 70:82 dB.
> > Loudness of Helmke is practically as previously but they are 2.5% more economical.
> > According to tests, 7.5 kW engine is only marginally OU, about 105% only
> > and 4.4 as well 5.5 kW, the best suited for 1 home only, very hard to achieve 100% with IE.2 engines.
> > But You have to take into advance that even simple electrical heaters (short circuit) have 85%.
> > Our CNFHR’S have constant relability to (-) 273 degs C, can work in outer space too for propulsion, but better suited for this the DRJ600 is which posses 3x output power.
> > This is unique 1 piece in the World only.
> http://nspap.livejournal.com/1398.html
> > On todays IE.2 engines it makes 350%, on IE.4 about 500% possible is.
> > Here in Poland it means in cheap night mode 10/24 H some 7-10x more economy over gas/coal.
> > But this really for 24/24 H mode intended is, also well over 4-6 times cheaper than coal/gas.
> > The smallest 11 kW is in this option for 10.000 sqm to heat (new homes).
> More about our civilian CNFHR’s You will kindly find in this chapter:
> http://nspap.livejournal.com/25641.html
> > Yours
> > Dr Adolf Nowak
> http://www.nspap.livejournal.com
Sounds much like the typical hooey surrounding cold fusion. Looks like you decided to copy their act.
We have this for years.
And You never ever heard about Potapov?
His russian devices were proved long time ago in America.
http://overunity.com/10403/academician-y-s-potapov/
I have definitely heard of the second law of thermodynamics. Take your spammy fake load of bullshit somewhere else.