That Settles That

Good news-bad news for Catholic schoolboys!!  First the good news.  Recently completed research claims to show the Catholic clergy (seven out of ten priests agree!!) are finally slowing down on their child sex abuse.  We all wish to believe that the era of priestly “hide yo kids, hide yo wife, and hide yo husband cuz they rapin’ everybody out here” days of the Catholic Church are well behind us.  Literally.  All clergy should now remain three steps behind, and at least a couple “wide-stances” off to the side, of ALL children, just for safety’s sake.

Now for the bad news.  The research appears to be totally funded by the Catholic Church.  Public outrage fueled a demand to get to the bottom of why the priests were so interested in all the cherubic young bottoms.  Besides, who else would have so much actual on-the-job (hands-on?) experience with these desirable young bottoms than the actual perpetrators themselves?

The 1.8 million dollar cost of the study was therefore funded entirely from Catholic sources.  Some might think that’s a lot to pay for damage control.  The church was looking at alternative ways to improve their image at a less exorbitant price.  They came up empty in their search for prominent public pedophiles they could inexpensively call as expert witnesses on behalf of their depraved buggery.   I guess NAMBLA wasn’t available to speak on their behalf or are militantly anti-Catholic, so this rather expensive self serving bit of research had to suffice instead.

The part of the research I’ll highlight here in this post claims the widespread abuse of the past was due to the Church’s failure to train the clergy not to molest the children.  The Church is now training the staff not to molest the children. The problem is solved.  Safe to bring your kids and your wallet back to mass.  Pope wants you good Catholics to get the word out on that asap.

The full report is a good 150 pages long (link below), and is titled as clearly as the Presidential Daily Brief that George Bush ignored pre-911 (Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US).

The Catholic version of the 9-11 Commission Report, concerning their own complicit history of slamming inappropriate projectiles into unsuspecting targets is clearly and aptly titled as well “The Causes and Context of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests in the United States, 1950-2010

Note it says causes.  I don’t have the desire to consume the full 150 odd pages myself right now, so I’ll focus on my favorite from what I have consumed:

Turns out the clergy was unaware it was immoral and illegal to go about buggering little boys all these years!  Whocouldanode?  I’m not a Bible scholar, so I didn’t realize their Bible based morality was lacking advice in this regard, and they needed advanced seminars instructing them on the negative social mores of tinkering with a toddler’s testicles e.g..  So they’ve instituted changes to the priestly curriculum by adding a new class at Catholic Priest Jesus College Seminary LLC.

They don’t call the new class “Why You Shouldn’t Molest the Children 101”.  That type of pre-Orwellian language is as outdated as the use of the word torture ferchrissakes.  From the report:

Human formation in seminary is critically important. The drop in abuse cases preceded the inclusion of a thorough education in human formation, but the development of the curriculum of human formation is consistent with the continued low levels of abuse by Catholic priests (118).

Human formation is what they needed training in?  That must be the worst euphemism for a class on “don’t perform sex acts with kids” that one could possibly imagine.  If nothing else, it helps to illustrate how hopelessly self unaware these clueless reprobate bastards really are.

The other part of the report was meant to address the context (read ‘environment’) in which this ecclesiastical debauchery was born.  I’ve heard they blame it on the hippies, but that’s so “South Park has already done that” it’s kind of hard for me to believe.  I also heard that prominent Catholic spokesperson Bill Donahue is upset the report favored hippie bashing over the more tried and true gay bashing, but that’s a little too much ‘inside baseball’ for this post, The main thing is that the study is scientific. The fact that hippie bashing  has a higher public acceptance factor these days than gay bashing is simply a happy scientific coincidence.

In retrospect, it makes the abuse I suffered at the hands of the protestant denominations I was forced to attend in my youth, look like a walk in the park compared to that of your average bright-eyed Catholic choirboy.  Only the serendipity of birth into a protestant household averted a potentially tragic situation where I might have been forced to swallow something even more disgusting than insane church doctrine.  For that I give thanks.

I was make to suffer through all manner of fools and fanatics as they weekly, flailed themselves down the aisle, flopping their way towards the pulpit like circus seals, to repent their sins yet again, (and to bask in the great glory of Jeebus).  Memories like that are horrible enough to forget, but I pity the poor Catholic children.   Can I get an Amen on that?

No need to feel sorry for me,   I was about five years old when I became self aware that religion (like Santa) was all bullshit, and therefore I was mentally armored against all such similar twaddle.  Public exhibitions of grand pageantry in support of the new Santa were useless against me.  Even witnessing firsthand, the nearly universal adult participation and excitement in the new Santa was useless against my inoculated mind .  All hail the old Santa!!


9 thoughts on “That Settles That

  1. “I was about five years old when I became self aware that religion (like Santa) was all bullshit”

    Ha! I like it, “I was five when I came to an emotional realisation, unverified by evidence, philosophy or logic! I am so smart. And very proud of this fact!”

    It never ceases to amaze me that some people are proud of having reached a conclusion at an age so young that it could not possibly have been related to a true understanding of the facts, when it turns out later on that the position they chose was luckily the correct position.

    • I had plenty of information to make a correct analysis at that age on the subject at hand.. Some people are smarter than others. I’m surprised you are so amazed though. It’s not like I had a mountain of evidence to sort through in order to make that decision.

      • Ha! Of course you did. You were a super smart five year old.

        All that tells us is either you have deluded yourself into thinking your current reasons are the ones that motivated you as a child, or that your reasons are that of a five year old child. :p

      • Try not to kid yourself. In the 45 odd years since I formed the initial conclusion, it’s not like there’s been any evidence I’ve seen that would change my mind. There’s plenty of other things I thought I had figured out when I was five that I later found out were incorrect. At some point, I discovered that my seemingly innate process of filtering bullshit from fact was already a process people called SCIENCE. It’s something that I find as useful a discovery to me as shoes and socks.

      • You innately performed science at the age of five? Your reasoning is getting ever so motivated.

  2. Dorel shows the correspondent intellectual density of many of the religious supporters I encounter. Favoring sophism over science obviously puts one at an extreme disadvantage in a debate that relies on the latter.

    • Being aware that you did not “innately perform science” at 5 years old, to correctly determine for the correct reasons that there is no God is not density. If you had some self awareness you’d see that.

      Your reasoning is motivated by ego-protection. You wish to believe that you had special insight from a young age, and that this insight was as deep and rational as an adults reasoning. You wish to believe that whatever childish (descriptive not insulting) and emotionally driven conclusion you developed at that young age was based on some special innate “understanding” of science and therefore the universe. Unfortunately that is clearly not the case: either you still have a 5 years olds understanding of the universe or you have developed more sophisticated reasoning as you have grown up and merely believe that that’s what you worked out all those years ago.
      Your motivation to insult me is obvious. People are unreasonably embarrassment about being wrong about themselves and thinking they are smarter than they are. It shouldn’t be embarrassing, it’s simply how our brains work, a large ego, confirmation bias, motivated reasoning and all that were survival advantages that were passed down because they did something useful.

      • All my example proves is that you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see through the smoke and mirrors of the religious make-believe. All the rest of your armchair psychology is as useless at tits on a boar.

  3. Give a five year old some magnets and a variety of ferrous and non-ferrous metals to experiment with and you’ll be able to witness the innate process of scientific discovery firsthand. It’s not rocket science. At about age seven you may wish to introduce a battery, a piece of wire, and a light-bulb to the mix if you really want to see some excitement.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.